indirect intention crime is a common concept in criminal law. It refers to the situation where the perpetrator knows that their actions may cause harm but does not actively prevent it, allowing the result to happen. 🤔 Does this kind of behavior have a "purpose"?

Firstly, the purpose of indirect intentional crimes lies in the subjective intent of the perpetrator. They do not directly aim for the harmful outcome but are aware and indifferent to its possibility. For example, someone throws a stone into a crowd knowing injury might occur but doesn't care about stopping it. 💣 In this case, the "purpose" can be seen as the pursuit of other goals while ignoring the potential consequences.

Secondly, from a legal perspective, the establishment of indirect intentional crimes does not require an explicit purpose like direct intentional crimes. Instead, it focuses on the awareness and acceptance of risks. This reflects society's emphasis on preventing potential dangers rather than just punishing clear intentions. 📝

In summary, indirect intentional crimes have an implicit "purpose" related to the perpetrator’s awareness and tolerance of risks. This understanding helps us better grasp the essence of such crimes. 🔍